| Centers/Programs | IFPRI |
| Target Regions | Asia, CWANA, LAC, SSA |
| Countries of Planned Research | | Potential Beneficiary Countries |
 | |  |
|
Bolivia, China, Ecuador, Ghana, Kenya, Morocco, Malawi, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda |
| | |
Burkina Faso, Bolivia, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Ghana, Kenya, Morocco, Mali, Malawi, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda |
|
|
| CGIAR Priorities |
1A - Conservation and characterization of staple crops 1B - Promoting conservation ands characterization of under-utilized plant genetic resources to increase the income of the poor 1C - Conservation of indigenous livestock 2C - Enhancing nutritional quality and safety 2D - Genetic enhancement of selected species to increase income generation by the poor 3A - Increasing income from fruit and vegetables 3B - Income increases from livestock 4D - Sustainable agro-ecological intensification in low- and high-potential environments 5A - Science and technology policies and institutions 5C - Rural institutions and their governance 5D - Improving research and development options to reduce rural poverty and vulnerability Development Activities - Development Activities Stand-alone Training - Stand-alone Training
|
| Financing Sources |
Members: Brazil, FAO, IDB, IDRC, IFAD, Japan, Sweden, United States, World Bank Non Members: Agricultural Research Council, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Confederacion Colombiana de Algodon, Ethiopia, IKP Trust, Mercy Corps, Others, OXFAM, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Unres+Other Sources, Wageningen University |
Project Overview and Rationale
The sustainable management of genetic resources is fundamental for agricultural productivity growth and the improvement of the livelihoods of the rural poor. Among other functions, the sustainable management of genetic resources ensures the viability of agricultural production, contributes to food security, and supports income generation and diet diversity leading to better nutrition. As such, the management of genetic resources is the basis of all crop maintenance, characterization and enhancement programs of the CGIAR and of national agricultural research systems.
The project’s research has two main goals. First it aims at providing new knowledge and policy guidelines to optimize the use of the existing pool of genetic resources and technologies accessible to small farmers in order to minimize their production risk in an increasingly changing environment. Second, it aims at assessing the actual or potential economic impact of new seed-based technologies, constraints to their delivery and adoption, and the conditions under which they are most likely to perform, in order to facilitate the choice and effective introduction of technologies adapted to the need and demand of farmers in developing economies. The rationale for pursuing this research agenda is that the generated outputs will lead to increased uptake of policies, practices, and technologies that will raise the productivity and resilience of small producers and improve their livelihoods in a sustainable manner
|
Project Outputs
| Output Title | 1:
Assess the role of crop genetic resource management as a tool to increase the resilience of producers to biotic and abiotic constraints. |
| Output Description |
This research involves two studies that focus on the role of genetic resource management strategies in increasing resistance to pest and diseases and to climate variability. The first activity involves the evaluation of the effect of genetic choices on farmers’ vulnerability to pest and diseases. Study areas are located in China, Ecuador, Morocco and Uganda. Valuing this effect will enable us to understand: a) farmer’s decision with respect to genetic choice; and b) the interactions between genetic choice and other production and control inputs. This activity is part of a GEF project: “Conservation and Use of Crop Genetic Diversity to Control Pests and Diseases in Support of Sustainable Agriculture”, coordinated by Bioversity International. The team will use its advanced knowledge in valuing crop diversity to complement with the work of Bioversity International on conservation and use of crop diversity.
The second activity will focus on determining how crop biodiversity, as part of a diversified production system, can help in increasing the resilience of small farmers to climate change. Current literature indicates that biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems can help in maintaining productivity by increasing mean yields and reducing yield variability, especially in vulnerable production system. But it focuses on the output of only one crop and a few years. In contrast, our research will explore long run effects of agro-biodiverse systems. The main specific outputs of this projects include: a) a set of tools to guide the research on adaptation to climate change through agricultural biodiversity, b) elements for designing a long term monitoring system of productivity and resilience, c) the definition of research protocols that can be used and adapted to different regions and latitude, and d) proposed policy instruments that can support conservation and management of agricultural biodiversity.
|
|
| CGIAR Priorities | |
| Countries of Planned Research |
Bolivia, China, Ecuador, Ghana, Morocco, Uganda |
|
| Intended Users |
National research and extension programs in target countries, CGIAR centres working on agricultural biodiversity, NGOs, researchers from universities and agricultural research institutes, government ministries and development agencies. |
| Outcome |
National research programs develop evidence to support and explain the contribution of genetic resources to decrease the vulnerability of farmers to biotic and abiotic stresses. |
| Impact |
Genetic diversity is more broadly / appropriately used by farmers and stakeholders, leading to more sustainable production systems." |
Output Target
| Year |
Target Type |
Target Description |
2009 |
Practices |
A more visible and user-friendly web-based ASTI platform that includes links to other datasets related to S&T in agriculture and food. |
2009 |
Practices |
An up-to-date and comprehensive database on financial and human capacity trends in public and private agricultural R&D in Sub-Saharan Africa. |
2009 |
Practices |
Expanded database including quantitative information on emerging areas of interest to policymakers, S&T managers, researchers, and other stakeholders, specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. |
2010 |
Policy strategies |
Quantitative information on emerging areas of interest to policymakers, S&T managers, researchers, and other stakeholders, specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. |
2010 |
Practices |
An up-to-date and comprehensive database on financial and human capacity trends in public and private agricultural R&D South Asian agricultural R&D. |
2011 |
Other kinds of knowledge |
Improved network of national, regional, and other stakeholders. |
2011 |
Policy strategies |
An update on the status of agricultural R&D investments worldwide. |
2011 |
Policy strategies |
Quantitative information on emerging areas of interest to policymakers, S&T managers, researchers, and other stakeholders, specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. |
2011 |
Practices |
An up-to-date database on financial and human capacity trends in public agricultural R&D investments in developing countries |
|
| Output Title | 2:
Adoption, socioeconomic, and gender impacts of transgenic crops: guiding methods and policies to maximize the potential of biotechnologies for the poor |
| Output Description |
This research output focuses on two related topics: a) the identification of a practical approach for evaluation and monitoring of socio-economic impacts of transgenic crops in West Africa, and b) the analysis of gender differences in the observed adoption of transgenic crops in developing economies.
First, building on its previous work on the impact assessment of genetically modified crops, the team plans to work on the adoption and validation of a common approach to the ex-ante and assessment and ex-post monitoring of socio-economic effects of transgenic crops in countries of the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU). The selected methodology will be validated in the setting of two case-studies: the potential effects of Bt cotton adoption in Mali, and the actual farm level effects of Bt cotton in Burkina Faso. This activity will generate a validated a ready-to-use methodology, as well as policy findings as to possible improvements to sustain or improve the likelihood of Bt cotton being a successful technology in the region. The second activity will explore gender differences in the adoption of genetically modified crops in developing countries. The overall objective of this study is to identify the social, economic and institutional factors that differentiate women and men’s attitudes and risk perception toward biotechnology. To accomplish this objective, the study will provide insight to the multiple variables that act to influence women and men’s knowledge of biotechnologies, and provide a more comprehensive understanding of how that knowledge may influence their attitude towards agricultural innovation, and ultimately impact their practice or farming techniques. The findings should inform agriculture policy design and encourage gender-sensitive policies that will direct agricultural innovations to women and men farmers equally, for beneficial impacts to the overall economy.
|
|
| CGIAR Priorities | |
| Countries of Planned Research |
Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania |
|
| Intended Users |
Regional biosafety and biotechnology regulators, national regulators and researchers, national and international policymakers, local, national and regional organizations. |
| Outcome |
A validated method is used by regulators in assessing or monitoring biotechnology crops in West Africa; policy recommendations encourage gender-sensitive improvements in the design of policies and technologies. |
| Impact |
Improved access and better distributed benefits from existing or new biotech crops that contribute to increase income for the rural poor." |
Output Target
| Year |
Target Type |
Target Description |
2009 |
Practices |
Conceptual frameworks, tools and methods required for analyzing and comparing agricultural S&T for innovation systems and processes developed and tested in selected countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. |
2010 |
Policy strategies |
Analysis completed on comparative S&T policy systems in selected countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. |
2011 |
Policy strategies |
Guidelines and recommendations for strengthening agricultural S&T for innovation policy systems and processes specified and communicated in selected countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. |
2011 |
Policy strategies |
Regional and sub-regional analyses and comparisons of agricultural S&T systems, processes, and influence on agricultural innovation. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Note: Financial Tables, Target Regions, CGIAR Priorities and Financing Sources show aggregated data for more than one MTP project and in particular for: - Subtheme 9.1: Genetic Resource Policies for the Poor (GRP 1) - Subtheme 9.2: Agricultural Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (GRP 31) - Subtheme 9.3: Program on Biosafety Systems (GRP 34)
|
|
Allocation of Member, Non-Member Grants and other sources to projects, 2009-2011 in $millions
| Project |
Member |
Actual 2009 |
Estimated 2010 |
Proposal 2011 |
Project Total | 6.841 | 7.879 | 7.706 |
| Theme 9: Science and Technology | Member | Brazil | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| FAO | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| IDB | 0.040 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| IDRC | 0.057 | 0.075 | 0.087 |
| IFAD | 0.061 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Japan | 0.045 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Sweden | 0.046 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| United States | 3.842 | 3.623 | 3.496 |
| World Bank | 0.000 | 0.085 | 0.069 |
| Non Member | Agricultural Research Council | 0.104 | 0.165 | 0.192 |
| Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation | 0.858 | 0.988 | 1.172 |
| Confederacion Colombiana de Algodon | 0.008 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Ethiopia | 0.019 | 0.076 | 0.000 |
| IKP Trust | 0.036 | 0.202 | 0.250 |
| Mercy Corps | 0.029 | 0.096 | 0.092 |
| Others | 0.158 | 0.257 | 0.204 |
| OXFAM | 0.007 | 0.045 | 0.003 |
| Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey | 0.038 | 0.047 | 0.066 |
| Wageningen University | 0.029 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Unres+Other Sources | Unres+Other Sources | 1.461 | 2.214 | 2.075 |
|
Allocation of Project Costs to CGIAR Priorities, 2009-2013 in $millions
| Project |
Actual 2009 |
Estimated 2010 |
Proposal 2011 |
Plan 1 2012 |
Plan 2 2013 |
| Priorities |
| Theme 9: Science and Technology |
Project Total | 6.841 | 7.879 | 7.706 | 8.015 | 8.336 |
| 1A | 0.918 | 1.058 | 1.034 | 1.077 | 1.120 |
| 1B | 0.019 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.023 |
| 1C | 0.019 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.023 |
| 2C | 0.451 | 0.520 | 0.509 | 0.529 | 0.550 |
| 2D | 0.575 | 0.662 | 0.647 | 0.673 | 0.700 |
| 3A | 0.441 | 0.507 | 0.496 | 0.516 | 0.537 |
| 3B | 0.038 | 0.044 | 0.043 | 0.045 | 0.047 |
| 4D | 0.616 | 0.709 | 0.694 | 0.721 | 0.750 |
| 5A | 1.683 | 1.938 | 1.896 | 1.973 | 2.052 |
| 5C | 0.757 | 0.872 | 0.853 | 0.887 | 0.923 |
| 5D | 0.365 | 0.420 | 0.411 | 0.427 | 0.444 |
| Development Activities | 0.480 | 0.553 | 0.540 | 0.562 | 0.584 |
| Stand-alone Training | 0.479 | 0.552 | 0.539 | 0.561 | 0.583 |
|
Project investment by developing Region, 2009-2013 in $millions
| Project |
Target Regions |
Actual 2009 |
Estimated 2010 |
Proposal 2011 |
Plan 1 2012 |
Plan 2 2013 |
Project Total | 6.841 | 7.879 | 7.706 | 8.015 | 8.336 |
| Theme 9: Science and Technology | Asia | 1.043 | 1.528 | 1.865 | 1.940 | 2.018 |
| CWANA | 0.000 | 0.188 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| LAC | 0.401 | 0.675 | 0.340 | 0.354 | 0.368 |
| SSA | 5.397 | 5.488 | 5.501 | 5.721 | 5.950 |
|
|
|