| Centers/Programs | IFPRI |
| Target Regions | Asia, LAC, SSA |
| Countries of Planned Research | | Potential Beneficiary Countries |
 | |  |
|
Bangladesh, China, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Malawi, Pakistan, El Salvador, Uganda, Vietnam, South Africa |
| | |
Bangladesh, China, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Malawi, Pakistan, El Salvador, Uganda, Vietnam, South Africa |
|
|
| CGIAR Priorities |
2A - Maintaining and enhancing yield potential of food staples 2B - Tolerance to selected abiotic stresses 2C - Enhancing nutritional quality and safety 3A - Increasing income from fruit and vegetables 3B - Income increases from livestock 5B - Making international and domestic markets work for the poor 5C - Rural institutions and their governance 5D - Improving research and development options to reduce rural poverty and vulnerability New Research Areas - New Research Areas
|
| Financing Sources |
Members: European Commission, Germany, IDB, IFAD, Sweden, UNDP, United Kingdom, United States, World Bank Non Members: CARE, Cornell University, Economic and Social Research Council, El Salvador, Ethiopian Development Research Institute, Foundation for Investment and Export Development, George Mason University, Georgia State University, HarvestPlus/CP, Hewlett Foundation, Japan Bank for International Development (JBIC), JICA, National Institutes of Health, Others, Overseas Development Institute (ODI), Oxford University, Save the Children Federation, Inc., Social Impact, Inc., University of Andina Simon Bolivar, University of Laval, UNOPS, Unres+Other Sources, World Food Program (WFP) |
Project Overview and Rationale
Increasingly recognized as a critical part of social policy, social protection systems have been used to enable individuals, families, and communities to reduce risk and/or mitigate the impacts of stresses and shocks to their livelihoods. They may also be used to support people who suffer from chronic incapacities to secure basic subsistence. Such interventions can contribute to poverty reduction and growth through investments in health, nutrition, and education for children and adults, development of productive infrastructure, and promotion of livelihoods activities. This research program focuses on social protection interventions that aim to reduce poverty, malnutrition, and vulnerability through promoting investments in human capital. It generates and uses quantitative and qualitative data to understand the impact pathways of alternative interventions affecting human capital and poverty reduction. It considers the different geographical, economic, social and political contexts within which these interventions operate, as well as shocks, and the implications for outcomes. It then examines how this understanding can contribute to innovations in policy and program design to enhance the quality, reach, and impacts of interventions to reduce poverty and vulnerability in both the short- and long-term.
Goals and Objectives
The objective of this research is to use data from evaluations of interventions designed to increase human capital to understand the policies, interventions, and other factors that lead to sustainable poverty reduction and nutritional improvements. Further, the project aims to use these findings to facilitate development of policies and interventions for sustainable poverty reduction and nutrition improvement in poor countries through:
- increased understanding of the impacts and pathways of impact—in the short-, medium- and long-term—of alternative interventions to increase human capital and promote sustainable poverty reduction and nutrition improvement, in the context of chronic poverty, vulnerabilities, and adverse shocks;
- new evidence on the medium- and long-term effects of specific policies and interventions that reduce poverty and improve other dimensions of well-being and the use of this understanding to develop innovations in policy and program design to improve the quality, reach, and impacts of interventions to reduce poverty and vulnerability in both the short- and long-term;
- the development of best practices in quantitative and qualitative research methods to evaluate and compare various interventions, including data sets incorporating advances in the design and implementation of individual and household survey techniques created;
- understanding the role of contextual factors, including shocks, policy processes, political economy, institutions and governance in explaining outcomes related to safety net and social protection programs; and
- the development of capacity for design, implementation, and evaluation of interventions.
|
Project Outputs
| Output Title | 1:
Innovations developed in research designs and analytical methods for evaluations of policies and programs to provide social protection, reduce poverty, and improve human capital of the poor (3-5 years). |
| Output Description |
Innovations developed in research designs and analytical methods to evaluate policies and programs to improve human capital of the poor and promote sustainable poverty reduction, food security and human capital—including (1) health, nutrition and education programs adapting to new regions; (2) new program designs intended to achieve new human capital objectives, such as enhanced skills, women’s empowerment, reduced health risks, and adolescents' hope for the future; and (3) programs operating within different vulnerability contexts. IFPRI’s state-of-the-art knowledge and innovativeness in research design in quantitative and qualitative methods gives it a distinct comparative advantage in achieving these outputs. |
|
| CGIAR Priorities | |
| Countries of Planned Research |
Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Pakistan, El Salvador, Vietnam, South Africa |
|
| Intended Users |
Government departments across sectors (health, nutrition, education, finance, and other) and NGOs (international and national) responsible for evaluating interventions or with a stake in evaluation results; donors (including multilateral organizations) that fund interventions; research institutions and local firms that carry out evaluations. |
| Outcome |
Users adapt research designs for evaluating new types of interventions aimed at strengthening human capital, and other safety net and social protection programs. Rigorous and accurate evaluations become more common and are promoted by donors, multilateral institutions, and governments. Policymakers are enabled to make better informed policy decisions and there are greater program and policy impacts which result in the reduction of rural poverty and vulnerability. |
| Impact |
Better designed programs lead to measurably higher impacts on poverty, health, education and nutrition; more efficient operations; and reduced vulnerability." |
Output Target
| Year |
Target Type |
Target Description |
2009 |
Practices |
A more visible and user-friendly web-based ASTI platform that includes links to other datasets related to S&T in agriculture and food. |
2009 |
Practices |
An up-to-date and comprehensive database on financial and human capacity trends in public and private agricultural R&D in Sub-Saharan Africa. |
2009 |
Practices |
Expanded database including quantitative information on emerging areas of interest to policymakers, S&T managers, researchers, and other stakeholders, specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. |
2010 |
Policy strategies |
Quantitative information on emerging areas of interest to policymakers, S&T managers, researchers, and other stakeholders, specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. |
2010 |
Practices |
An up-to-date and comprehensive database on financial and human capacity trends in public and private agricultural R&D South Asian agricultural R&D. |
2011 |
Other kinds of knowledge |
Improved network of national, regional, and other stakeholders. |
2011 |
Policy strategies |
An update on the status of agricultural R&D investments worldwide. |
2011 |
Policy strategies |
Quantitative information on emerging areas of interest to policymakers, S&T managers, researchers, and other stakeholders, specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. |
2011 |
Practices |
An up-to-date database on financial and human capacity trends in public agricultural R&D investments in developing countries |
|
| Output Title | 2:
Increased understanding of the impacts and impact pathways—in the short-, medium-, and long-term—of alternative interventions to increase human capital and promote sustainable poverty reduction, food security, and nutrition improvement (5 years). |
| Output Description |
This is the core of Subtheme 7.2—the evaluation of impacts of interventions on poverty and human capital. The activities involve use of rigorous quantitative and qualitative research designs and methods to determine program impacts, explanations for those impacts, and analysis of program operations. The results are used directly to inform policy and program development and strengthening. IFPRI has a strong comparative advantage in this work because of its methodological skills, interdisciplinary staff, and long-standing experience with these issues. |
|
| CGIAR Priorities | |
| Countries of Planned Research |
Bangladesh, China, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Malawi, Pakistan, El Salvador, Uganda, Vietnam, South Africa |
|
| Intended Users |
Government Ministries and departments across sectors, national and international NGOs, donors and researchers with a stake in sustainable poverty reduction, increasing food security and improving human capital. |
| Outcome |
Users employ better information in choosing among alternative interventions and in designing interventions. Users employ public resources for increasing human capital and social protection more efficiently and effectively to contribute to sustainable poverty reduction, increased food security, reduced malnutrition. |
| Impact |
Sustainable poverty reduction, food security and nutrition is improved through: Greater investment in food security, health, education, and nutrition of children and adults, and greater income earning potential for current and future generations and reduced poverty; The ability to stem the loss of human capital and even build it in the context of shocks. " |
Output Target
| Year |
Target Type |
Target Description |
2009 |
Practices |
Conceptual frameworks, tools and methods required for analyzing and comparing agricultural S&T for innovation systems and processes developed and tested in selected countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. |
2010 |
Policy strategies |
Analysis completed on comparative S&T policy systems in selected countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. |
2011 |
Policy strategies |
Guidelines and recommendations for strengthening agricultural S&T for innovation policy systems and processes specified and communicated in selected countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. |
2011 |
Policy strategies |
Regional and sub-regional analyses and comparisons of agricultural S&T systems, processes, and influence on agricultural innovation. |
|
| Output Title | 3:
Increased understanding of the impacts of shocks on poverty, food security and human capital, and innovations in social protection interventions that can best respond to new conditions, for different regions and demographic groups in the short, and longer term (3 years). |
| Output Description |
The description and activities under this output are similar to those under Ouput (2) above; however, the focus of this output is in adapting interventions to be responsive to shocks. The main emphasis in this work in the coming period is on HIV and AIDS, and rising food prices. Attention is paid to differences in geography, population groups, and other contextual factors, and to short- and longer-term impacts. IFPRI’s comparative advantage lies in its experience and years of research experience in the area of HIV, AIDS and food security, and in the expertise of its senior researchers in analyzing the consequences of rising food prices for food and nutrition security, and the implications for intervention design. |
|
| CGIAR Priorities | |
| Countries of Planned Research |
Bangladesh, Uganda, South Africa |
|
| Intended Users |
Government Ministries and departments in countries hard hit by HIV and AIDS, and rising food prices. National and international NGOs, donors, and researchers contributing to the response. |
| Outcome |
Users employ better information in adapting interventions that respond to shocks, in different regions for different groups over short and longer term. Governments able to respond more quickly and flexibly to emerging issues and to assisting their populations affected by shocks. |
| Impact |
Adverse impacts of shocks reduced for most vulnerable." |
Output Target
| Year |
Target Type |
Target Description |
2009 |
Practices |
Recommendations, tools and methods for effective extension systems developed. |
2010 |
Other kinds of knowledge |
Evidence of impact of various extension and education programs developed. |
2011 |
Practices |
Innovative rural extension and education models developed and tested. |
|
| Output Title | 4:
Increased understanding of how social protection programs address the needs and conditions of particularly vulnerable groups such as indigenous persons and adolescent girls at high risk of HIV. |
| Output Description |
This output involves research on policy processes, institutions, and program operations, in order to develop an understanding of why policies and interventions do or do not have the impacts intended. Many well-designed policies and programs hit bottlenecks, but the reasons are often not studied or well analyzed. IFPRI’s comparative advantage is this area comes from having developed a research program on policy processes, having carried out successful and innovative operations research in several countries, and its ability to combine qualitative and quantitative research methods. |
|
| CGIAR Priorities | |
| Countries of Planned Research | |
| Intended Users |
Government Ministries and departments responsible for social protection programs of vulnerable populations. |
| Outcome |
Users employ new strategies and program designs that are more appropriate to the conditions, constraints, and needs of these vulnerable populations. |
| Impact |
Human capital indicators are improved among vulnerable groups HIV risk is reduced among adolescent girls" |
Output Target
| Year |
Target Type |
Target Description |
2010 |
Policy strategies |
Assessment completed for replicability of the rural strategy developed for Peru, Ecuador, one Central American country and Tanzania and for other developing countries. |
2011 |
Policy strategies |
A scaling up framework for rural strategy developed above for Andean countries and 2 Sub-Saharan African countries. |
2012 |
Policy strategies |
A scaling up framework for rural strategy developed above for 2 additional Sub-Saharan Africa countries. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Note: Financial Tables, Target Regions, CGIAR Priorities and Financing Sources show aggregated data for more than one MTP project and in particular for: - Subtheme 7.2: Large-Scale Interventions to Enhance Human Capital (GRP 28) - Subtheme 7.3: Strengthening Women’s Control of Assets for Better Development Outcomes (GRP 42)
|
|
Allocation of Member, Non-Member Grants and other sources to projects, 2009-2011 in $millions
| Project |
Member |
Actual 2009 |
Estimated 2010 |
Proposal 2011 |
Project Total | 6.866 | 8.012 | 9.393 |
| Theme 7: Poverty, Nutrition, and Social Protection | Member | European Commission | 0.000 | 0.200 | 0.733 |
| Germany | 0.641 | 1.664 | 1.934 |
| IDB | 0.441 | 0.462 | 0.000 |
| IFAD | 0.064 | 0.186 | 0.449 |
| Sweden | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.071 |
| UNDP | 1.442 | 0.596 | 0.000 |
| United Kingdom | 0.136 | 0.060 | 0.000 |
| United States | 0.256 | 0.165 | 2.134 |
| World Bank | 0.091 | 0.278 | 0.331 |
| Non Member | CARE | 0.067 | 0.125 | 0.150 |
| Cornell University | 0.054 | 0.029 | 0.000 |
| Economic and Social Research Council | 0.194 | 0.067 | 0.027 |
| El Salvador | 0.376 | 0.221 | 0.150 |
| Ethiopian Development Research Institute | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Foundation for Investment and Export Development | 0.035 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| George Mason University | 0.000 | 0.180 | 0.000 |
| Georgia State University | 0.038 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| HarvestPlus/CP | 0.863 | 0.053 | 0.000 |
| Hewlett Foundation | 0.199 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Japan Bank for International Development (JBIC) | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| JICA | 0.129 | 0.934 | 0.683 |
| National Institutes of Health | 0.094 | 0.218 | 0.000 |
| Others | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Overseas Development Institute (ODI) | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.000 |
| Oxford University | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Save the Children Federation, Inc. | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Social Impact, Inc. | 0.056 | 0.081 | 0.089 |
| University of Andina Simon Bolivar | 0.017 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| University of Laval | 0.002 | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| UNOPS | 0.021 | 0.068 | 0.000 |
| World Food Program (WFP) | 0.073 | 0.271 | 0.596 |
| Unres+Other Sources | Unres+Other Sources | 1.566 | 2.129 | 2.046 |
|
Allocation of Project Costs to CGIAR Priorities, 2009-2013 in $millions
| Project |
Actual 2009 |
Estimated 2010 |
Proposal 2011 |
Plan 1 2012 |
Plan 2 2013 |
| Priorities |
| Theme 7: Poverty, Nutrition, and Social Protection |
Project Total | 6.866 | 8.012 | 9.393 | 9.769 | 10.159 |
| 2A | 0.086 | 0.100 | 0.117 | 0.122 | 0.127 |
| 2B | 0.086 | 0.100 | 0.117 | 0.244 | 0.127 |
| 2C | 0.172 | 0.200 | 0.235 | 0.122 | 0.254 |
| 3A | 1.099 | 1.282 | 1.503 | 1.563 | 1.626 |
| 3B | 1.098 | 1.282 | 1.503 | 1.563 | 1.625 |
| 5B | 0.667 | 0.779 | 0.913 | 0.950 | 0.987 |
| 5C | 1.520 | 1.774 | 2.080 | 2.163 | 2.250 |
| 5D | 1.520 | 1.774 | 2.080 | 2.163 | 2.249 |
| New Research Areas | 0.618 | 0.721 | 0.845 | 0.879 | 0.914 |
|
Project investment by developing Region, 2009-2013 in $millions
| Project |
Target Regions |
Actual 2009 |
Estimated 2010 |
Proposal 2011 |
Plan 1 2012 |
Plan 2 2013 |
Project Total | 6.866 | 8.012 | 9.393 | 9.769 | 10.159 |
| Theme 7: Poverty, Nutrition, and Social Protection | Asia | 1.972 | 2.289 | 3.075 | 3.198 | 3.326 |
| LAC | 2.860 | 3.320 | 3.051 | 3.174 | 3.300 |
| SSA | 2.034 | 2.403 | 3.267 | 3.397 | 3.533 |
|
|
|