| Centers/Programs | IFPRI |
| Target Regions | Asia, CWANA, LAC, SSA |
| Countries of Planned Research | | Potential Beneficiary Countries |
 | |  |
|
China, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Jordan, Kenya, Cambodia, Kuwait, Morocco, Mali, Malawi, Nigeria, Nepal, Sudan, Swaziland, Thailand, Tunisia, Tanzania, Uganda, Vietnam, Zambia |
| | |
China, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Jordan, Kenya, Cambodia, Morocco, Mali, Malawi, Nigeria, Nepal, Sudan, Swaziland, Thailand, Tunisia, Tanzania, Uganda, Vietnam, Zambia |
|
|
| CGIAR Priorities |
2A - Maintaining and enhancing yield potential of food staples 2B - Tolerance to selected abiotic stresses 2C - Enhancing nutritional quality and safety 3A - Increasing income from fruit and vegetables 3B - Income increases from livestock 4A - Integrated land, water and forest management and landscape level 4C - Improving water productivity 4D - Sustainable agro-ecological intensification in low- and high-potential environments 5A - Science and technology policies and institutions 5C - Rural institutions and their governance 5D - Improving research and development options to reduce rural poverty and vulnerability Development Activities - Development Activities New Research Areas - New Research Areas
|
| Financing Sources |
Members: Canada, China, European Commission, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States, World Bank Non Members: Centre for World Food Study, CHEMONICS, German Development Institute, Human Science Research Council, Innovations for Poverty Action, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD), Others, Unres+Other Sources, US Dept of Agriculture (USDA), Yemen |
Project Overview and Rationale
The overall goal of this program is to conduct research on policy options to have more efficient targeting of investment resources, to finance the required investment, and to improve efficiency within the agencies that provide public goods and services.
Project Rationale
Developing countries and the international development community are intensifying their efforts by increasing and redirecting resources in order to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In 2002, at the Monterrey Conference, rich countries renewed their pledge to increase their development assistance to 0.7 percent of their GDP. More recently, the UN Millennium Project called for a ‘big push’ in donor support to meet the MDG challenge. In 2005, the Commission for Africa called for rich countries to double their aids to Africa and to cancel debts poor countries owe to rich countries. Through the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, the U.S. government pledged a 50 percent increase over its existing $10 billion annual funding for U.S. development and humanitarian assistance. So far 18 developing countries have benefited and signed compacts with the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) totaling more than US$6.3 billion to be allocated across various economic and social sectors; and 23 more are eligible to benefit. More importantly, many developing countries have adopted the concept of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs), or equivalent strategies, to outline strategic plans and to earmark financial resources to achieve their poverty reduction goals. In Africa, the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) was formed by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government in July 2001 in Zambia, with the objective is to commit themselves to a new partnership in development by improving their governance through peer-review monitoring and evaluation systems; and the leaders pledged to allocate 10 percent of their national budgetary resources towards the implementation of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP).
If all these resources are in place, the key questions are: can these pledged resources achieve the stated objectives of growth and poverty reduction? How should these resources be allocated among different sectors such as agriculture, infrastructure, health, and education? What types of public spending programs (and under what conditions) have the largest impact on the poor? Do public institutions that implement public spending or investment matter?
|
Project Outputs
| Output Title | 1:
Priorities of public investment for promoting rural growth and reducing poverty is assessed, and the role of governance in public investment is better understood (three years) |
| Output Description |
Research program activities: - review and document changes in the composition, levels, and sources of financing of public investments in rural areas in developing countries, along with the factors determining investments decisions and reasons for changes in trends and composition;
- analyze the growth, poverty, environmental and other human development impacts of different types of public investments in rural areas, including social evaluation of individual investment projects;
- develop monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems for public spending in agriculture and rural areas, and improve the link between resource allocation decisions and impact assessment results;
- analyze the political and institutional context of public investments, and conditions for efficient provision of public goods and services;
- develop and offer policy guidelines on future priorities for government investments; and
- analyze options for financing public investments to achieve development outcomes.
Comparative and complementary advantage of the research
Within IFPRI, this sub-theme’s research activities complement those on Governance and Policy Processes (Sub-Theme 5.2, GRP37) and on Large-Scale Interventions to Enhance Human Capital (Sub-Theme 7.2, GRP28). However, while this sub-theme’s research focuses on broader types of investments either by sector or by region, Sub-Theme 7.2’s research focuses on targeted groups and/or individuals. GRP37’s research focuses on how to improve the performance of institutions and governance related to public spending.
Change in output from the previous MTP
There is no change in this output from the previous MTP. |
|
| CGIAR Priorities | |
| Countries of Planned Research |
China, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Jordan, Kenya, Cambodia, Kuwait, Morocco, Mali, Malawi, Nigeria, Nepal, Sudan, Swaziland, Thailand, Tunisia, Tanzania, Uganda, Vietnam, Zambia |
|
| Intended Users |
Researchers, policymakers and practitioners in developing countries. |
| Outcome |
Data and results used by researchers, policymakers, practitioners in analyzing and setting priorities and improving the efficiency of public investment for promoting growth and poverty reduction in developing countries. |
| Impact |
Increased amount, improved allocation, and improved governance of public investment for higher growth and greater poverty reduction in developing countries." |
Output Target
| Year |
Target Type |
Target Description |
2011 |
Other kinds of knowledge |
Database on public spending (agriculture, education, health, transportation, defense, social security) in 67 developing countries made publicly available on IFPRI website. |
2011 |
Policy strategies |
Research results generated on the efficiency and effectiveness of public investment for rural growth and poverty reduction in selected developing countries in: Sub-Saharan Africa (Ethiopia, Ghana, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Uganda); West Asia and North Africa (Yemen); East Asia (China); and Southeast Asia (Vietnam). |
|
|
|
|
 |
Note: Financial Tables, Target Regions, CGIAR Priorities and Financing Sources show aggregated data for more than one MTP project and in particular for: - Subtheme 6.1: Priorities for Public Investment in Agriculture and Rural Areas (GRP 3) - Subtheme 6.2: Country Development Strategy Research (GRP 32) - Subtheme 6.3: Urban-Rural Linkages and Nonfarm Rural Development (GRP 36) - Subtheme 6.4: Support to the Implementation of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) (GRP 44)
|
|
Allocation of Member, Non-Member Grants and other sources to projects, 2009-2011 in $millions
| Project |
Member |
Actual 2009 |
Estimated 2010 |
Proposal 2011 |
Project Total | 13.278 | 14.571 | 16.584 |
| Theme 6: Development Strategies | Member | Canada | 1.089 | 0.575 | 0.295 |
| China | 0.106 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| European Commission | 1.222 | 1.331 | 1.000 |
| Germany | 0.105 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Ireland | 0.447 | 0.425 | 0.346 |
| Netherlands | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.576 |
| Spain | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.576 |
| Sweden | 0.977 | 1.340 | 2.322 |
| United Kingdom | 1.442 | 1.449 | 0.859 |
| United States | 4.786 | 5.571 | 8.394 |
| World Bank | 0.195 | 0.227 | 0.000 |
| Non Member | Centre for World Food Study | 0.047 | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| CHEMONICS | 0.725 | 1.167 | 0.108 |
| German Development Institute | 0.043 | 0.013 | 0.000 |
| Human Science Research Council | 0.020 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Innovations for Poverty Action | 0.018 | 0.043 | 0.000 |
| Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD) | 0.000 | 0.121 | 0.106 |
| Others | 0.195 | 0.106 | 0.000 |
| US Dept of Agriculture (USDA) | 0.168 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Yemen | 0.052 | 0.174 | 0.000 |
| Unres+Other Sources | Unres+Other Sources | 1.641 | 2.019 | 2.002 |
|
Allocation of Project Costs to CGIAR Priorities, 2009-2013 in $millions
| Project |
Actual 2009 |
Estimated 2010 |
Proposal 2011 |
Plan 1 2012 |
Plan 2 2013 |
| Priorities |
| Theme 6: Development Strategies |
Project Total | 13.278 | 14.571 | 16.584 | 17.248 | 17.938 |
| 2A | 0.017 | 0.018 | 0.021 | 0.022 | 0.022 |
| 2B | 0.017 | 0.018 | 0.021 | 0.022 | 0.022 |
| 2C | 0.033 | 0.036 | 0.041 | 0.043 | 0.045 |
| 3A | 0.286 | 0.313 | 0.357 | 0.371 | 0.386 |
| 3B | 0.286 | 0.313 | 0.357 | 0.371 | 0.386 |
| 4A | 0.197 | 0.216 | 0.246 | 0.256 | 0.266 |
| 4C | 0.197 | 0.216 | 0.246 | 0.256 | 0.266 |
| 4D | 0.203 | 0.223 | 0.254 | 0.264 | 0.274 |
| 5A | 1.825 | 2.002 | 2.279 | 2.370 | 2.465 |
| 5C | 1.825 | 2.002 | 2.279 | 2.370 | 2.465 |
| 5D | 5.472 | 6.007 | 6.834 | 7.109 | 7.394 |
| Development Activities | 0.903 | 0.991 | 1.128 | 1.173 | 1.220 |
| New Research Areas | 2.017 | 2.216 | 2.521 | 2.621 | 2.727 |
|
Project investment by developing Region, 2009-2013 in $millions
| Project |
Target Regions |
Actual 2009 |
Estimated 2010 |
Proposal 2011 |
Plan 1 2012 |
Plan 2 2013 |
Project Total | 13.278 | 14.571 | 16.584 | 17.248 | 17.938 |
| Theme 6: Development Strategies | Asia | 3.007 | 3.215 | 3.630 | 3.775 | 3.926 |
| CWANA | 0.773 | 0.806 | 0.903 | 0.939 | 0.977 |
| LAC | 1.461 | 1.603 | 1.824 | 1.897 | 1.973 |
| SSA | 8.037 | 8.947 | 10.227 | 10.637 | 11.062 |
|
|
|